libellous
音標(biāo)發(fā)音
- 英式音標(biāo) [?la?b?l?s]
- 美式音標(biāo) [?la?b?l?s]
- 國(guó)際音標(biāo) ['laib?l?s]
- 英式發(fā)音
- 美式發(fā)音
基本解釋
- adj. 誹謗的;損害名譽(yù)的(等于libelous)
同根派生
- n性質(zhì)的同根詞
- libel:誹謗罪;詆毀;毀壞名譽(yù)的東西;控訴書(shū)。
- vi性質(zhì)的同根詞
- libel:進(jìn)行文字誹謗。
- vt性質(zhì)的同根詞
- libel:中傷;控告;對(duì)…進(jìn)行誹謗。
英漢例句
- And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “l(fā)ibellous book”.
美國(guó)律師、言論自由捍衛(wèi)者羅伊德?阿勃拉姆斯強(qiáng)調(diào),出版社之流依然要小心那些寫(xiě)過(guò)“誹謗書(shū)籍”的作者。 - Bloggers are too numerous and too poor to be sued, and many of the servers that host their libellous musings are based outside England and Wales, and are therefore beyond the reach of English courts.
因博友如此之多,又如此貧困而無(wú)法對(duì)他們進(jìn)行控告,而且大多數(shù)將他們帶有誹謗文字的、沉思性質(zhì)的文章聚集起來(lái)的博友并不在英格蘭和威爾士的管轄范圍之內(nèi),因此英國(guó)法庭也是鞭長(zhǎng)莫及。 - Sometimes the plaintiffs are dissidents, complaining about libellous attacks on them by state-friendly foreign media; a lawsuit in London may be their only chance of redress.
有時(shí)候,原告是一幫跟官府意見(jiàn)不同的主兒,受不了一幫親近官府的記者成天毀他們;倫敦的官司八成是他們唯一的平反昭雪的機(jī)會(huì)。 - Milton explains that the Licensing Order of 1643 is ineffective, it's useless because, and I'm quoting here, " order avails nothing to the suppressing of scandalous, seditious, and libellous books, which were mainly intended to be suppressed."
彌爾頓解釋說(shuō)《出版管制法》毫無(wú)作用,一無(wú)是處,我引用他的話說(shuō)原因“,因?yàn)檫@個(gè)管制法對(duì)控制誹謗性的,有煽動(dòng)性的,中傷他人的需要被控制的書(shū)籍毫無(wú)用處“
耶魯公開(kāi)課 - 彌爾頓課程節(jié)選 - Over the fact that the search engine does remove the results which make these shown to be either privacy busting or libellous allegations but only when they are shown to be so.
FORBES: Max Mosley's Very Amusing Attempt to Sue Google
雙語(yǔ)例句
原聲例句
權(quán)威例句
詞組短語(yǔ)
- Libellous Book 誹謗書(shū)
- libellous libelous 損害名譽(yù)的
- libellous writing 帶永久形式誹謗的文字
- a libellous statement 誹謗性的說(shuō)法
- Him looks libellous 他看上去好像受了中傷
短語(yǔ)
英英字典
- If a statement in a book, newspaper, or magazine is libellous, it wrongly accuses someone of something, and is therefore against the law.